Friday, February 14, 2020

The US govrnement recently approved a 700$ billion bail out package to Essay

The US govrnement recently approved a 700$ billion bail out package to help stabalize the U.S DO YOU SUPPORT OR OPPOSE THE PACKAGE TAKE A POSTION AND IN FIVE PAPRAGRAPHS DISCUSS AND JUSTIFY YOUR POSTION - Essay Example eby stock prices kept dropping, on the other hand this was the only way to improve on the liquidity position of banks whereby banks lacked financial capital, if this actions were not undertaken then the cost of borrowing would have increased. The action by the government improved investor confidence whereby days after the approval of the bail out stock prices started to increase, if actions were not undertaken immediately a worse scenario would have resulted affecting even other economies of the world. Therefore immediate actions to stabilize the market were an appropriate decision. However many individuals disapprove the actions undertaken but in the case of a crisis like the one experienced, immediate actions had to be undertaken to avoid adverse effects such as an unstable financial market, high borrowing rates and unstable

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Case Study Analysis Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Analysis - Case Study Example We all agree that wife battering is a serious crime in the law however a battered individual should not take matters into his/her hands, but should let the law take its course (Federal Judicial Center, 2002). In this case, Dr. Bauer should pursue her duties responsibly, in spite of the pity that she feels for the wife. How should she proceed? For justice to be attained in this scenario, Bauer should not try anything which will be against the course of justice. The role of the law is to protect the rights of the people, and since the attorney has trusted her enough to give her the task, she should undertake the matter with a lot of integrity (Federal Judicial Center, 2002). She should concentrate her efforts towards the selection of a panel that is competent in what they are going to do. Integrity and justice should be her driving forces in the process, putting it in her head that one time in her life she will also require justice. If the wife is guilty, she should be punished accordi ngly by the law. However, we cannot overrule the fact that the crime might have been committed in self defense. As a result, Bauer should let the real truth be discovered in order for fair judgment to be made. Should Bauer offer her advice regarding the syndrome evidence? Why or why not. Bauer can only do that if whatever she is going to say will be of help in the quest for the truth. It is apparent that she really is against women battering and very sympathetic towards the woman. The strategy to be used during the defendant’s trial will determine the magnitude of the sentence to be administered. She surely should give her advice, if she feels that the syndrome gives inadequate evidence which may lead to an unfair sentence. However, since her role is not to identify the strategy, she should not choose the strategy to be used. All she will do is to give advice on what she thinks will serve best the interests of the case, though this should be done without any form of bias (Can adian Judicial Council, 2000). She can also present her strategy (PTSD) so that those concerned with that role will make an informed decision on the strategy to be used. Should Bauer Pursue The Poison Pill Strategy? Why or Why Not. Her main aim of wanting to pursue the poison pill strategy is to block the truth from being discovered. According to her, she will select jurors who are going to conflict in such a way that their discussions won’t result in anything worth. It will be evil for her to pursue something which is going to waste people’s time. She should know that truth should always be left to reign in any circumstance. By pursuing the pill strategy, it may lead to the dismissal of the panel and new members appointed to take over the case. Unfortunately, if this happens it can only be worse for her because the new panel of jurors may even be too harsh on the defended. The poison pill strategy she chose may eventually work against her unless if it is executed with a lot of wisdom. Thus, she should come up with another better and fair strategy. What Are the Ethical Implications of Dr. Bauer’s decision? The decision made by Bauer is immoral and unethical since it is against the realization of justice (Canadian Judicial Council, 2000). As much as Bauer feels great pity for the battered wife, she should not defend the woman unethically. Rather she should look for